TDEE Calculator for Women Over 40
TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) is the number of calories you burn in a full day: your resting metabolism plus movement and exercise. For a woman over 40, TDEE is calculated with the Mifflin-St Jeor equation: BMR = 10 x weight(kg) + 6.25 x height(cm) - 5 x age - 161, then multiplied by an activity factor between 1.2 (sedentary) and 1.9 (extremely active).
Typical TDEE for women over 40 (5'4", by weight and activity)
Compare your result with typical values:
| Weight | Sedentary | Lightly active | Moderately active |
|---|---|---|---|
| 140 lb | 1,518 cal | 1,739 cal | 1,961 cal |
| 160 lb | 1,627 cal | 1,864 cal | 2,101 cal |
| 180 lb | 1,736 cal | 1,989 cal | 2,242 cal |
| 200 lb | 1,845 cal | 2,114 cal | 2,383 cal |
| 220 lb | 1,953 cal | 2,238 cal | 2,523 cal |
Estimates from Mifflin-St Jeor at age 45, height 5'4". Your exact number depends on your height and age; use the calculator above.

Maya Coach AI
Let me get to know you deeply and stay by your side every single day, helping you get leaner and feel beautiful and happier, with a plan built just for you.
I want Maya's helpHow this calculator works
The formula and the science behind it
A typical 45-year-old woman who is 5'4", 165 lb and lightly active has a TDEE of roughly 1,900 calories per day. Eating at TDEE maintains weight; eating 300 to 500 calories below it produces gradual fat loss of about 0.5 to 1 lb per week.
Mifflin-St Jeor (women): BMR = 10 x weight(kg) + 6.25 x height(cm) - 5 x age - 161 (Mifflin MD et al.)
TDEE: TDEE = BMR x activity factor (1.2 to 1.9) (ADA evidence analysis of RMR prediction equations)
Why TDEE changes after 40
Two things shift in your 40s: muscle mass gradually declines (about 3 to 8% per decade after 30 without strength training), and hormonal changes around perimenopause alter how your body stores fat. Muscle is metabolically active tissue, so less muscle means a slightly lower BMR. The Mifflin-St Jeor equation already accounts for age, which is why your TDEE at 45 is lower than it was at 25 at the same weight.
The practical takeaway is not that weight loss becomes impossible after 40. It means your calorie budget is a little tighter and preserving muscle (protein plus resistance training) matters more than it did at 25.
How to use your TDEE number
Eat at your TDEE to maintain weight. To lose fat, subtract 300 to 500 calories: that produces roughly 0.5 to 1 lb of loss per week, a pace that preserves muscle and is sustainable. Never eat below 1,200 calories per day without medical supervision.
Remember TDEE is an estimate with a margin of error around 10%. Track your real-world trend for 2 to 3 weeks and adjust: if your weight is stable at your calculated deficit, your true TDEE is lower than estimated.
Frequently asked questions
What is a normal TDEE for a woman over 40?
Most women over 40 have a TDEE between 1,600 and 2,200 calories per day, depending on weight, height and activity level. A sedentary 45-year-old at 5'4" and 165 lb burns about 1,650 calories; the same woman exercising 3 to 5 times a week burns about 2,140.
Is Mifflin-St Jeor accurate for women over 40?
Yes. The American Dietetic Association's evidence review found Mifflin-St Jeor the most reliable prediction equation for resting metabolic rate in the general adult population, accurate within 10% for most people. Individual variation still exists, so treat the number as a starting point.
How many calories should I eat to lose weight after 40?
Subtract 300 to 500 calories from your TDEE. For a typical TDEE of 1,950, that means eating 1,450 to 1,650 calories per day for a loss of 0.5 to 1 lb per week. Do not go below 1,200 calories per day without medical supervision.
Does menopause lower TDEE?
The menopause transition is associated with a decline in fat-free mass and total energy expenditure, though much of the change tracks with age and activity rather than menopause itself. Strength training and adequate protein offset most of the difference.
Sources
- Mifflin MD et al. A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990
- Frankenfield D et al. Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005
- Volpi E et al. Muscle tissue changes with aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004